![]() Now that you understand the usefulness of the index expression in everyday situations, let’s take a look at how to apply it. As you can see, this method is much more efficient.īelow: Duplicating layers using the index expression. With the index expression applied correctly, each new duplicate of your layer will automatically rotate for you. Normally, this would require painstakingly clicking each layer and adjusting its rotation one by one. Say you want to duplicate a layer, with each new layer offset by a certain rotation, to create something like a simple flower. Instead of wasting time tweaking the properties of individual duplicate layers, you can completely automate each new layer to change using this expression. But not expensive at all in the long run.Quickly create complex layer arrays in After Effects with the index expression. In short, FC and the MBPs are just tools for working (making videos in this case), and you know how expensive good tools cost a. Pieces of hardware that are too expensive to mount in a general use computer. Is because the software is designed to take advantage of the last developments in GPUs, processors, memory, etc, etc. The HDs wouldn’t be my main concern because the bottle-neck is in the CPU/GPU.īut if you intend to work with multilayers, FW800 will work much better.Īs many others, FC is a professional application and requires some minimum hardware specs, and this is not just because Apple wants to sell MBPs instead on MBs. Even with a MBP you may find that there are tasks that your GPU can not accomplish because the size because the picture is too big or because the bit-depth is too high. Your speed will depends of the hardware but also of the kind of footage you will work with and the kind of task you want to do.Ī MBP is in the limit of what you need to work in HD even if you work with low-data-rate formats (HDV, XDCAM). Fxplugs works in the GPU and applications like Motion and Colors relay in the GPU too. I am on a budget, and the less money spent for my editing functionality the better.įCS applications have become much more GPU dependent in the last few years. So my question for you gurus out there is: how important is firewire 400 vs firewire 800 for editing HD video off of a hard drive and what is a good processing speed for an amateur video editor on a budget ? Please don’t tell me I’ve spent all that money on FCS3 and so I might as well go overboard on an insanely high end machine to run it. Screen size is one (though not if you buy the 13″ macbook pro), processing speed is another (2.13 GHz to 2.26 GHz difference from the MB to the low end MBP), max ram (6.0 GB compared to 8 GB “actual max” according to mac tracker), and firewire (400 vs 800) – Oh and the shiny aluminum body. But spec for spec, the main differences I see between the MB and MBP are minor. I feel like the attitude at apple is that if you want to do video editing of any kind, you NEED a macbook PRO. How important is processing speed in working with HD video on Final Cut Pro ? (Compressed video, i think it’s safe to assume)Ģ.26 GHz enough? 2.4? 2.0? Do I really need 3 + GHz to run FCP with video files coming from ONE firewire 400 external Hard drive ? One says that I need at least 3.0 GHz, the other says there is little difference between 2.26 and 2.4 and that I could be fine with either. I’ve talked to two mac sales reps with contradicting claims. I’m looking at grabbing a new mac to run FCS 3 on (my integrated graphics card just can’t be tolerated any more), and I’m wondering about processing speed. I need some HONEST advice from the pros on this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |